Singapore: PDPC general public consultations open up for use of personalized information in AI devices and use of kid’s details
In transient
On 18 July 2023, the PDPC issued two public session papers, searching for views on: (a) the proposed clarifications on how the PDPA applies to the selection and use of personalized facts to develop and deploy artificial intelligence (AI) techniques that embed machine discovering models utilized to make decisions, recommendations or predictions and (b) the proposed Advisory Tips on the PDPA for children’s personal facts, masking problems these kinds of as getting children’s consent, using kid’s individual details and according larger requirements of safety to children’s private information.
Crucial takeaways
The issuance of the public session papers alerts the PDPC’s ongoing commitment to encouraging the liable progress and adoption of AI technological know-how, and the require to shield children specifically in a digital setting. The community session documents can be accessed listed here and below. Intrigued events might post their views to the PDPC by 31 August 2023.
In extra element
The PDPC issued two public session papers on 18 July 2023.
The first relates to the Advisory Pointers on the Use of Personalized Details in AI Recommendation and Conclusion Systems below the PDPA (“AI Advisory Tips“). The AI Advisory Rules clarify how the PDPA applies to the selection and use of personal facts by organizations to create and deploy programs that embed equipment studying products, which are utilised to make choices autonomously or to support a human conclusion-maker through suggestions and predictions.
The AI Advisory Suggestions count on the present notification and accountability obligations to stimulate organizations to get further actions in relation to AI methods. Corporations adopting AI techniques really should take into consideration offering extra information and facts on the subsequent in crafting their notifications:
- The operate of their solution that involves assortment and processing of personal facts (e.g., suggestion of motion pictures)
- A common description of varieties of personalized info that will be collected and processed (e.g., movie viewing heritage)
- Explanation of how the processing of personalized details gathered is appropriate to the product characteristic (e.g., analysis of users’ viewing background to make film tips)
- Identification of distinct functions of own data that are far more possible to affect the product attribute (e.g., no matter whether a motion picture was considered totally, viewed several times, and many others.)
As for the accountability obligation, the AI Advisory Pointers motivate organizations to offer a lot more information on details high quality and governance measures taken for the duration of AI System progress, only if this sort of information and facts is deemed related and doing so does not compromise protection, protection or professional confidentiality.
The next relates to the Advisory Pointers on the PDPA for Children’s Individual Information, at this time contained in Chapter 8 of the PDPC’s Advisory Suggestions on the PDPA for Picked Topics. The general public is invited to offer feedback on, between many others, the age threshold on when a child can give valid consent on their own behalf, and the adequacy of actions that an group must consider to make sure higher requirements of defense of kid’s individual data.
